Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - sgtjdusar

Pages: 1 2 [3]

Politics / Re: Whic 2016 Presidential Candidate is best for the Financial Domination Interest?

« on: December 23, 2015, 04:04:39 AM »

Thank you.

Being that I am a U.S Citizen I am not too familiar with Canadian Politics. That being the case, I surely cannot write a good opinion on the topic of the politics in Canada. However, I do get the impression based on what I see is the thinking that Canada is not really even a country. Sorry Canadians. Just my observable opinion. Without the U.S, Canada could not exist. However, got to say one good thing about Canadian FD's Some of them seem very good FD's.

For a Money Slave who would enjoy the idea of Currency Domination finding a Canadian FD could be a perfect FD relationship. Just have to find the right Canadian FD.

Politics / Whic 2016 Presidential Candidate is best for the Financial Domination Interest?

« on: December 19, 2015, 04:44:50 AM »

The question of which Year 2016 U.S.A Presidential Candidate would have the best interest of the practice of financial domination is a difficult question to answer. The main problem involved with the question is that as far as we know none of the Presidential Candidates have any idea, opinion or practice or experience in the practice of FD. In fact, most likely all of them would probably rather avoid the topic or feel very uncomfortable making any statement about the practice of FD.

So who among the year 2016 U.S.A Presidential Candidates should those of us involved in the FD Interest support?

Being, that Libertarian political thought is a political philosophy based on individual freedoms and a un obtrusive government in the personal lives of people I would think those of us involved with FD should support the most Libertarian Candidate. In my opinion that would at this present time among the Republican Party Candidates would be Rand Paul. Republican Senator from Kentucky. Some may say why not Donald Trump? Or even why not Ted Cruz?

In the case of Donald Trump. I consider him more authoritarian then Libertarian. Not to mention the personality of Donald Trump would go against the idea of a submissive male money slave. Granted, their ares ome Male FD's. However, they are not considered for this topic. (Maybe some other time). The idea of Donald Trump coming in favor of the FD art seems an unlikely event. He is a Businessman and I do not see him personally submissive to his Wife. Granted who knows?

Ted Cruz: He is a very strong Conservative. However, also an authoritarian. Ted Cruz if given the opportunity to speak about FD I would expect him to be quite negative in his ideas.

Rand Paul: A consistently Libertarian with Conservative leanings. However, Rand Paul does make it clear that he supports individual freedom including freedom of association Which is an absolute necessity within the FD interest.

So what about the Libertarian Party? Voting Libertarian would be the best option I think. Mark Feldman is probably the most favorable of any Presidential Candidate to the FD Interest.

I think we in the FD Interest should support Open and free Immigration. Especially among Central Americans, Caribbean and Sub Sahara Africans. The reason is that those of us within the FD Interest should promote the idea of the practice of FD. Those of us withing the FD interest who also have an interest in Racial Domination. Especially those of us Whites who believe that Non Whites should be able to own White Slaves should encourage Immigration into the U.S. The reason is that may make it easier for even just one of those Immigrants may want to enter the U.S.A in order to own White Slaves. That being the case, we in the FD Interest can determine which Presidential Candidate would be most favorable to the practice of FD?

Among the Democrats of Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders: The problem with these two is the Socialist and Big Government Welfare State Supporting politics of these two. The problem here is that FD is based and worked best in a Free Market Capitalism system. The basic ideas of Socialism and Liberal Political ideas and economics are diametrically opposed to the practice of FD.

Personally, I recommend Rand Paul. He may not even come close. However, his ideas are most in line with the art of FD. Secondly, Register to vote as a Libertarian and then vote in November 2016 for Mark Feldman.

Financial Domination Discussion / Unrequited Love within Financial Domination Relationships

« on: December 17, 2015, 04:03:47 AM »

"I hold it true, whate'er befall; I feel it, when I sorrow most; 'Tis better to have loved and lost Than never to have loved at all."
-Alfred Lord Tennyson.

Within Financial Domination Relationships Unrequited Love can be a major problem. It is most likely a problem especially for the usually submissive Money Slave. Financial Dominants can experience unrequited love as well. However, maybe not to such a degree as the usually more submissive money slave.

Reality within FD is that most FD's tend to be naturally dominant (True FD's). So they will tend to most often view submissive personalities as those that they have a need to control. Or at the minimum to exercise a degree of influence over a money slave. So most likely a FD who finds her money slave not attending to her needs would most likely lose interest in her submissive very quickly and view the submissive more in terms of disobedient or even disrespectful. So the sense of love a FD would feel toward a submissive is probably much different than the love a money slave may feel towards a FD. Now granted, in a long term FD relationship that the FD finds her money slave wandering towards other FD's may feel hurt and pain and even feel a sense of disillusionment. Maybe even wanting to give up practicing FD. In that case as well may be an exception. However, still a FD generally has a higher sense of natural dominant personality and probably could recover from that relationship quicker than a submissive money slave.

In the case of a submissive Money Slave when a money Slave falls in love with an FD who does not feel the same sense of love in the relationship the pain can be very real. Especially if the money slave is of a sensitive personality. Granted, a money slave who does not get reciprocated can likely just find another FD. However, just as in all relationships after time and energy and emotions are invested in the relationship when the FD does not feel love for her money slave the money slave will find a deep sense of rejection.

Starting with denial the submissive may think: Maybe she is just a hard personality. Or maybe I should try harder. Maybe she needs more time to get to know me. etc.

What should a money slave do who has a FD who does not feel the same way he feels for her?

1. Try to be clear with your intentions from the start. This may be hard as most FD's may not trust a money slave. FD's are often lied to a lot in the start of relationships and so they may tend to be hard shells. But, if you are consistent over time and she remains cold or closed to you. You may have to face reality that the relationship is not proceeding the way you hope. Problem may get worse if you cannot accept it.

2. If you have a close friend who knows you are a Money Slave try to accept your friend counsel. And outside observer may be your best option to give you truth.

3. If all else fails you may want to try searching for a more compatible FD. The fortunate thing about being a money slave is that their is never a shortage of claimed FD's. However, granted almost all the claimed FD's are fake, But try and try again. I know I have.

Financial Domination Discussion / Re: Can a Financial Dominant be Paid or given money?

« on: December 13, 2015, 12:53:32 AM »

yourmoneyslave.

Thank you for responding. However, I do not think you understood the opinion. Or maybe you have preconceived ideas of the opinion.

First, as you so stated: "First of all...it all depends if you are spoiling just one Goddess or more than one". Obviously in that situation you are or were not owned by a particular FD. So the concept of Not being able to pay a FD would not apply to you if the FD does not own you. Maybe re-read what I wrote?

Second, A True FD (If she is a good FD who knows what she is doing) if her slave is is married or has other family obligations would probably best adapt to the situation. So the FD probably would want to make sure her owned Slave is able to meet his own personal and family obligations. I.e Paying Utility Bills, Car Insurance, Medical Bills, Child Tuition, etc. A good FD probably does not want to upset the Apple Cart. Providing if she intends the relationship to be in the Long or Life term. I know some FD's claim that they want to Bankrupt Slaves or want them to eat Ramen Noodles. Etc. However, I still think a smart FD would make efforts to make sure her slave obligations are met. Providing of course if she intends it to be in the long or life term. Let's face it. I am very certain that almost all FD's are aware their owned slaves are likely married or in permanent established relationships. Just common sense for a True FD to keep all things in her practice of the FD art. That will be another subject worth writing a topic on in the future.

As for "strict rules". I do not consider it that way. But more just common sense practice in the FD Art. Obviously if you are not owned by a FD you would be paying her for your "entertainment" which you so stated. I can guarantee that if you use that term: You are my "entertainment." to a True FD she would not be pleased with that description. At least the FD's I know anyway.

Also, being that I am not an authority on the FD Art, nor would I even want to be such an authority, I cannot make any rules for the practice of FD. They are my opinions for the best practice of FD. Take them or leave them. But, I think they work. Then again, I am very pessimistic the way FD is practiced in most cases.

Anyway, Thanks again YMS. Happy Times for you.

Religion / What is your Religious Preference? Let me know if I left some out.

« on: December 10, 2015, 04:49:09 AM »

Select your Religious Preference

Financial Domination Discussion / Can a Financial Dominant be Paid or given money?

« on: December 09, 2015, 02:46:38 AM »

Pay Me! Frack You, Pay Me! Give me your Money! Give me Money! Give your Money to Women!

Pay Me!: A Financial Dominant who owns a Money Slave(s) if the FD does indeed own the money slave, the money a money slave produces for the FD is already the owned money of the FD. Therefore, a True Financial Dominant cannot be paid as a financial dominant by her money slave. This term of "Pay Me!" is a term that is contradictory to the whole art of financial domination. If you are a money slave and you see this term you can be assured you likely are not viewing entries of a True Financial Dominant. Because the simple fact is a Financial Dominant owns the income and assets of her money slave. So thus she cannot pay herself to be a FD.

The exceptions to this rule are of course is if a FD is getting paid for services not related to FD. Such as being paid for a Cam Show. Unless her slave is the one receiving the cam show. If the slave pays her for the service it would not be considered a valid FD Transfer.

The other exception would be if a FD receives money as a FD from a slave not owned or not yet owned by her. But, once the slave is owned by the FD if the relationship is a True FD relationship money that the slave produces for the FD is already the money of the FD. The money Slave is simply transferring funds he produced to the FD.

Granted, New FD's who are not experienced with FD may not fully grasp the concepts of all of FD and may confuse the term of being paid. but, a True FD should soon know that being Paid is not possible in a True FD relationship.

Frack You, Pay Me!: Same as the above about Pay Me. However, adding Frack or the more direct profane word is probably without class or dignity. Granted some people find profanity natural to them. However, it is probably better for a True FD to avoid being seen as undignified or of a base living.

Give me your Money!, Give me Money!, Give your Money to Women!L Once again poor use of language by a True FD. Also a mistaken concept of FD. Just as in the Pay Me term a money slave cannot give money to his FD. The FD already owns the money if it is a True FD relationship. It would probably be better for a FD to order her slave to send her money to her personal account., Or to directly hand the money to her. Or transfer her money to her. But for a FD to tell a money slave to "give me your money!" is contradictory to the FD art as well. A Slave cannot give money to a FD that the FD already owns

I know of a supposed Twitter account personality who takes pride in using the term: "Give your Money to Women!" Using that term is obviously not a FD concept and definitely does not cater to money slaves.

If you are Money Slave looking for a FD. Be wary of claimed FD's using those terms. If you are a FD it is always best to be careful how you come across to others. Do your words, actions, practices and deeds and ethics reflect well on the art of financial domination?

Politics / Political Preference

« on: December 08, 2015, 04:13:05 AM »

Describe your Political Preference.

Politics / Immigration. Particularly on Undocumented Central Americans.

« on: December 08, 2015, 02:29:34 AM »

I have had some interest in the so called "Immigration crisis at the Southern U.S Border with Mexico". in particular of Central American Immigrants entering the U.S.A without Documents. In particular interest is the number of so called unaccompanied Minors. Also Haitian, Caribbean, Cuban and South American Immigration through Florida and the Gulf Coast.

Being that I consider myself a White Slave and a White Submissive who firmly supports the idea of Black, Hispanic (Latina) and East Asian Supremacy. It would only be consistent for me to support and encourage immigration of those groups into the U.S.A. However, in my case I would prefer those immigrants to want to come to the U.S.A who have a high sense of being Financial Dominant and wanting to acquire White Slaves. And that naturally would include the Undocumented.

Reality is though that I doubt any of the present immigrants especially the Undocumented to have any plan or intention or even the slightest thought to come to the U.S.A in order to collect and own a Money Slave(s). At least I have yet to see any evidence of that. The Immigrants that I have met and seen so far (Meaning the Undocumented). Seem to be quite uneducated and can barely read and write. I also have a friend who speaks Spanish and the way many of the Undocumented speak even in Spanish seem to think in a very basic level of intelligence and reasoning. This to me seems particularly true of those coming from Guatemala. So I do not think any concept of FD would ever come in their minds in order to live well in the U.S. I could be wrong. I am only basing this opinion on my own limited observations.

I do know as a money slave and as a White Slave I would hope to see a huge influx of Central American FD's coming to the U.S. Including those who bringi their minors with them intending to own White, U.S Citizen Money Slaves. But, reality is that I see that not happening in the least.

As for the case of unaccompanied minors coming into the U.S. If they are 15 and under they should be declared as abandoned by their parents and then made available for immediate, free and open adoption by any U.S Citizen willing to adopt them. If that was the case, everyone would benefit. Especially those who are having difficulty obtaining offspring.

Anyone else have thoughts on this subject?