Main Menu

Our Featured Financial Domme

Another Truth about the Financial Domination Interest.

Started by sgtjdusar, January 20, 2016, 09:14:54 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Are Woman capable of being a True Financial Dominant?

Yes.  I am a Woman and I am a True Financial Dominant
1 (50%)
Yes.  I have known a lot of True Financial Dominants.  
0 (0%)
Yes.  But probably a small number are True Financial Dominants
0 (0%)
Yes.  But, the number of True Financial Dominants is very rare.  
0 (0%)
Possibly,  However I tend to think some Woman can be True Financial Dominants
0 (0%)
Some may claim to be Financial Dominants.  However, I tend to think most are fake financial dominants.  
1 (50%)
No.  No Women are True Financial Dominants.  
0 (0%)
No.  All of what is thought to be Financial Domination is a Fraud and all those women claiming to be FD should be in jail for fraud.  
0 (0%)
Undecided.
0 (0%)
I am still examining this subject.  
0 (0%)

Total Members Voted: 2

Print
Go Down Pages1
User actions

sgtjdusar

January 20, 2016, 09:14:54 PM Last Edit: January 21, 2016, 08:51:46 PM by sgtjdusar
I have often wondered about the interest that Financial Dominants and those who claim to be Financial Dominants about their sincerity of wanting and the ability to be a financial dominant. 

Obviously some of the Cam Show Entertainers who role play the act of a financial dominant will freely admit they are simply doing cam shows in the FD Genre because their is a demand for that role play.  So obviously those Cam Show entertainers are not sincere about being a financial dominant.

We who have been in the Financial Domination Art for some time even know that their are a lot of those claiming to be financial dominants who are out to simply make a quick buck and know they are not a a financial dominant and not even possessing a dominant personality.  However,  they think if a guy wants to give them some money to call them a loser they will do it.  That is, for a price.     

But, what about  those who claim to be financial dominants?  Those  who consider themselves to be a financial dominant and will practice the art of financial domination?

I am a big time critic of the fake and pseudo FD's.  And will often claim that almost all of FD is fake.  I would even say greater than 99% of what is said to be FD is in reality not FD. 

Being that I have experience in the FD world of over 45 years  I believe I can correctly state that the best financial dominant barely reaches the standard of being a True FD.

Why do I think that?

The main reasoning is that Women by their very nature in almost all cases cannot be natural in a dominant setting.  Further, they likely are only acting dominant only because some man wants them to take on the role of a dominant Woman.  The point is most women are not capable of being a FD on their own. 

Here is the Truth:  Men are what make the FD interest.  Women in their natural state cannot be financial dominant.  They operate on a very relational aspect of their brain. It is the way they are created.

So can a woman be a True FD?   In almost all cases the answer is:  No.  However, a Woman who may have some dominant characteristics can be a True FD.  I would just say the probable percentage of Woman who claim to be involved in the FD interest who are indeed naturally dominant I think is probably 1 in 5,000.  If even that!

Any thoughts?





JD
Print
Go Up Pages1
User actions