I have often wondered about the interest that Financial Dominants and those who claim to be Financial Dominants about their sincerity of wanting and the ability to be a financial dominant.
Obviously some of the Cam Show Entertainers who role play the act of a financial dominant will freely admit they are simply doing cam shows in the FD Genre because their is a demand for that role play. So obviously those Cam Show entertainers are not sincere about being a financial dominant.
We who have been in the Financial Domination Art for some time even know that their are a lot of those claiming to be financial dominants who are out to simply make a quick buck and know they are not a a financial dominant and not even possessing a dominant personality. However, they think if a guy wants to give them some money to call them a loser they will do it. That is, for a price.
But, what about those who claim to be financial dominants? Those who consider themselves to be a financial dominant and will practice the art of financial domination?
I am a big time critic of the fake and pseudo FD's. And will often claim that almost all of FD is fake. I would even say greater than 99% of what is said to be FD is in reality not FD.
Being that I have experience in the FD world of over 45 years I believe I can correctly state that the best financial dominant barely reaches the standard of being a True FD.
Why do I think that?
The main reasoning is that Women by their very nature in almost all cases cannot be natural in a dominant setting. Further, they likely are only acting dominant only because some man wants them to take on the role of a dominant Woman. The point is most women are not capable of being a FD on their own.
Here is the Truth: Men are what make the FD interest. Women in their natural state cannot be financial dominant. They operate on a very relational aspect of their brain. It is the way they are created.
So can a woman be a True FD? In almost all cases the answer is: No. However, a Woman who may have some dominant characteristics can be a True FD. I would just say the probable percentage of Woman who claim to be involved in the FD interest who are indeed naturally dominant I think is probably 1 in 5,000. If even that!
Any thoughts?